aideploy --industry=professional-services --market=SG
AI agents for Singapore's professional services firms
Your margin is senior time — and too much of it goes to first-pass contract review, precedent hunting and onboarding paperwork. We build agents that do the first pass with citations, so qualified people only touch exceptions. Every build passes an Agent GPA evaluation before it goes near a client matter.
Anchor Sprint Pte. Ltd. · UEN 202632732ZEnterprise agents delivered across SingaporeEvery agent graded before go-livePDPC · MAS TRM · IMDA
Contract review with clause-level citations
First-pass review of NDAs, engagement letters and SPAs against your firm's playbook — every flag cited to the exact clause. Partners review exceptions, not entire documents.
Knowledge agent over your precedent archive
Ask questions across decades of precedents, working papers and past advice; every answer cites its source document. Associates stop billing hours to folder archaeology.
Client onboarding document checks
CDD packs, ACRA extracts, board resolutions and identity documents checked for completeness and consistency before the engagement letter goes out. New matters open in days, not weeks.
workflow: mapped
Where the billable hours actually go
A Singapore practice runs on documents: engagement letters, NDAs, SPAs and supplier agreements in the legal team; audit working papers and tax computations in the accounting practice; ACRA filings, board resolutions and registers on the corporate-secretarial side. They live in iManage, NetDocuments, SharePoint or a practice-management system, and the people reading them first are the most expensive people in the building. First-pass review, precedent search and onboarding checks are exactly the work agents handle well — because the source documents already exist and the correct answer is checkable.
agents: fitted
Four agent patterns that fit a firm
Contract review agents grade a document against your playbook and cite the clause behind every flag. Knowledge agents answer questions over your precedent and engagement archive with source citations, not summaries from nowhere. Corporate-comms agents draft client updates, circulars and filings-adjacent correspondence behind a mandatory human review gate. Onboarding agents check CDD documents against your matter-acceptance checklist and escalate gaps. None of them sign anything — they compress the first pass so a qualified reviewer works from a cited draft instead of a blank page.
- Contract review — playbook-graded, clause-level citations
- Knowledge agent — precedent and working-paper archive, sources cited
- Corporate comms — drafts held at a human review gate
- Onboarding — document completeness and consistency checks
data: contained
Confidentiality designed for privileged work
Client files in a law or audit practice carry privilege and PDPA obligations, so the data design comes before the prompt design. Inference runs against Singapore-region endpoints, client documents are never used to train any model, and access is scoped at matter level so an agent can only read what the requesting fee-earner could. Every retrieval and every output is logged, which gives you an audit trail your PDPA data protection officer can actually inspect. If a document class shouldn't leave your tenancy, it doesn't.
evals: passing
Evaluated before it touches a client matter
A contract-review agent that hallucinates a clause is worse than no agent. Every build passes an Agent GPA evaluation before go-live: graded against a gold set your partners have reviewed, with citation accuracy checked document-by-document and out-of-scope questions required to refuse rather than guess. That discipline comes from operating production systems — 300+ production incidents handled, 30+ resilience assessments, 50+ load-test audits — so the agent that passes evaluation also stays up during peak filing season.
engagement: scoped
Start with one workflow, not a transformation
We don't sell a firm-wide AI strategy. Pick the workflow that burns the most senior hours — usually contract first-pass or matter onboarding — and we scope it in two weeks: source systems, document samples, the evaluation gold set, and a fixed SGD price for the build. The pilot runs on real matters with your reviewers grading output before anything goes unsupervised. If the evaluation doesn't pass, we fix it before go-live, not after a client notices.
Frequently asked questions
What does an agent build cost for a Singapore firm?
Scoping determines the number, but most single-workflow builds — one contract-review or onboarding agent, integrated and evaluated — land in the SGD 20,000–60,000 range, plus model usage costs that typically run tens to a few hundred dollars a month at practice scale. The two-week scoping phase produces a fixed quote before you commit to a build. Run your own token maths first with our Claude cost calculator.
How do you handle client confidentiality and PDPA compliance?
Client documents stay within Singapore-region infrastructure, are never used for model training, and are access-scoped at matter level — the agent reads only what the requesting fee-earner could. All retrievals and outputs are logged for your data-protection officer, and the data-flow design is documented so it slots into your existing PDPA compliance framework rather than around it.
Can it integrate with our document management and practice systems?
Yes — that's most of the build. We integrate with iManage, NetDocuments, SharePoint and Google Workspace on the document side, and practice-management systems on the matter side, via their APIs. Where a system has no usable API, we design an export-based pipeline rather than pretending. Scoping includes a systems audit so integration surprises show up in week one, not week six.
How long before the first agent is live?
Two weeks of scoping, then typically four to eight weeks of build and evaluation depending on the number of source systems and how much gold-set review your partners can schedule. The evaluation gate is not skippable — the agent goes live when it passes Agent GPA on your documents, and the pilot runs supervised on real matters before anything is automated end-to-end.
Which AI model do you use — are we locked into one vendor?
We build Claude-first: Anthropic's models are currently the strongest at long-document legal and financial reasoning with accurate citations, and we're a member of the Anthropic Claude Partner Network with Claude Certified Architects on the team. But every build is model-agnostic by design — the evaluation harness is the contract, so if a better model appears, we swap it in and re-run the same Agent GPA evaluation before it touches your matters.
Scope your first agent
A 45-minute scoping call: we map one workflow, name the systems involved, and tell you honestly whether an agent fits. Anchor Sprint Pte. Ltd. (UEN 202632732Z), Suntec Tower One, Singapore.